BENCHMARKS OF ALLEGED AMD R9 380X WIth NVIDIA GTX 980

The news from the web "Chiphell" exposes the Benchmarks of the GPU, which is not yet on the market. They show the very new graphics card AMD 380X R9 which is gonna launch soon during this year. The results show incredible performance and 4k games support which exceeds the current monarch of the market, NVIDIA GTX 980.

As you can see in the pictures above, the results in theory correspond to the AMD 380X R9 is obviously erase the chart as it is classified information and publish freely that can obviously bring legal problems who published them. If so, NVIDIA is facing a problem that surely will try to solve with the GTX 980 Ti or new GTX Titan.

Source : ChipHell

NVIDIA’s Flagship Maxwell GM200 GPU Core, Reference point Board Features 12 GB VRAM, Superb Die

NVIDIA’s future flagship Maxwell based "GM200 GPU" core have been revealed by Video-cards exposing that the chip has is completely finalized and it will soon entering mass production to get incorporated in many Quadro and GeForce GPUs.

The leak in connection with GM200 GPU's core comes just a couple of days after it absolutely  reported that NVIDIA maybe have a Quadro M6000 card with the 12 GB VRAM although now it is confirmed.

The leak on the site was tipped by a company worker who was working at the actual manufacturing labs the place that the GM200 GPUs are produced in mass quantity to fulfill demand of users in the very next month. While there are no specifications or shots of the full board, these types of single leak verifies that NVIDIA’s GM200 GPU is usually ready and constant full production on NVIDIA Manufactures.

Where Some of the specifications reveal that this flagship Maxwell core are going to be using the PG600 board that has a code-name of 180-1G600-1102-A04. However It's hopefully going to make way in to professional Quadro cards first, there is no mystery about this chip may also be integrated in fresh and upcoming GeForce graphics cards like exclusive GeForce GTX Titan successor.

On the other hand, one thing we can't confirm right now is which market should it belong to so it may be either a GeForce or a Quadro variant. All of the other board shows 12 Hynix H5GQ4H24MFR memory chips that are the same ones utilized on GeForce GTX 980 & GeForce GTX 970, clocked in 7 GHz.

We guys are most likely considering a 384-bit bus if earlier leaks are involved. The Hynix storage chip are amazing with regards to OC and stability offering copious amounts of bandwidth & performance to users. The reference board coming with the two SLI gold-fingers in addition to display outputs consist of three Display ports & a single HDMI 2. 0 port.

However It appears the board sample doesn't allow the DVI port right now but we are able to see the connectors to the port are in place and we'll be looking with a similar display settings as other NVIDIA Maxwell GPUs.

Some of the most surprising thing in GM200 GPU, It is massive when it comes to die size. While Kepler GK110 experienced a die about 561mm-2, the very new GM200 is just around 600mm2.

The die is complete encircled with a metallic plate heat-spreader and looks exactly like the GK110. The chip is code-named as TAA156. 000 (1440A1) or even the GM200-400-A1. It is  still difficult to say if this will be the flagship GM200 SKU. A find of the earlier leaked specifications shows that the GM200 GPU attributes 3072 Core CUDA, up from 2048 around the current GM204 processor. Where the Maxwell SMM provides 128 streaming processors, there’s a complete of 24 SMM units enabled at the GM200 chip which will probably be fused on the Quadro M6000 GPU.

In spite of that, we are looking at 96 Raster operation units and 192-256 TMU. The card includes a pixel fill-rate involving 94.8 GPixels/s and also a texture fill-rate involving 252.9 GTexels/s. The GPU’s clock speeds are actually maintained at 988 MHz & does not feature GPU Boost, This can be preparatory clock speeds and might be changed in the future when the cards is officially released.

On the other side, we are experiencing at no less compared to 12 GB GDDR5 VRAM Memory because it replaces the K6000 which actually featured exactly the same buffer size. The card features a 384-bit memory user interface and memory clock is maintaned from 6. 6 GHz that pumps out 317. 4 GB/s.

GPU Name	NVIDIA Quadro M6000	NVIDIA Quadro K6000	NVIDIA Quadro K5000	NVIDIA Quadro K4000	AMD FirePro  W9100	AMD FirePro W8100	AMD FirePro W7100	AMD FirePro W5100
GPU Core	GM200	GK110	GK104	GK106	Hawaii XT	Hawaii Pro	Tonga Pro	Bonaire Pro
SMM/Compute Units	24	15	8	4	44	40	28	12
Core Count	3072	2880	1536	768	2816	2560	1792	768
Core Clock	988 MHz	900 MHz	700 MHz	811 MHz	930 MHz	824 MHz	950 MHz	930 MHz
ROPs/TMUs	96/192 or 256	48/240	32/128	24/64	64/176	64/160	32/112	16/56
FP32 Compute	6.07 TFlops	5.2 TFlops	2.15 TFlops	1.24 TFlops	5.24 TFlops	4.20 TFlops	2.87 TFlops	1.43 TFlops
VRAM	12 GB GDDR5	12 GB GDDR5	4 GB GDDR5	3 GB GDDR5	16 GB GDDR5	8 GB GDDR5	8 GB GDDR5	4 GB GDDR5
Memory Bus	384-Bit	384-Bit	256-Bit	192-Bit	512-Bit	512-Bit	256-Bit	128-Bit
Memory Bandwidth	317.4 GB/s	288 GB/s	173 GB/s	134 GB/s	320 GB/s	320 GB/s	160 GB/s	96 GB/s
Memory Clock	6.6 GHz	6.0 GHz	5.4 GHz	5.6 GHz	5.0 GHz	5.0 GHz	5.0 GHz	5,5 GHz
TDP	>200W?	225W	122W	80W	275W	220W	150W	75W

Nvidia gonna release three brand-new GeForce GTX graphics cards in January

Nvidia Corporation, Going to introduce three new GeForce GTX graphic cards this month, according to the new media-report. The new graphics cards will offer different levels of performance and definitely will address various markets segments.

The superbly manufactured three new graphics cards which are gonna announce soon are GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 960 Ti & GeForce GTX 965 Ti, according to Wccftech web-site. However the graphics cards may have similar model numbers, they are projected to be powered by unique graphics processing units and so will offer completely different levels of performance and it will be a great pleasure for the 4D game lovers to play high graphics games on it.

The GeForce GTX 960 is assigned for to be based on a new brand-new code-named "GM-206" chips with 128-bit memory bus and unknown quantity of stream processors. The GeForce GTX 960 Ti and GeForce GTX 965 Ti are actually manufactured by simply cut-down GM204 graphic processors with "256 bit" memory bus. The GeForce GTX 960 Ti gonna support 1280 extreme processors, whereas the actual GeForce GTX 965 Ti may feature 1536 high processors.

What's the fact here guys, the GeForce GTX 960 sports is respectively a low-performance graphics processing unit, this graphic card might barely defeat the GeForce GTX 760, in accordance with data published by Iyd.kr. The GeForce GTX 960 Ti and 965 Ti graphics cards will absolutely offer you guys considerably higher overall performance, which is much like of the GeForce GTX 780 performance.

It's expected that all three new GeForce GTX graphics cards are going to be announced on the 23rd of January, 2015.

NVidia GTX 780 Ti compared to NVidia GTX 970 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X GPU benchmarks and comparing review

Nvidia has made an amazing splash recently using its double-launch of the (Maxwell)  GTX 980 and GTX 970   (GPU) Graphic Cards. While the 980's price turn off all but by for the most dedicated of High Graphic game lovers, the GTX 970 commands at cost around the £300, making it some sort of easy to purchase if you really love their graphics.

However, it's some pretty cool competition, and the AMD's Radeon R9 290X and GTX 780 Ti both come with very similar prices. (See all GPU's and components reviews. )

 Radeon R9 290X, coming as it does from nVidia's very hot rival, AMD, is unsurprising being a rival. However, the presence in the GTX 780 Ti is quite more unexpected, since this is the product from nVidia's past generation, Kepler, and it is effectively the GPU, and the GTX 970 might be looking to exchange.

Supplies of GTX 780 Ti cards are actually starting to sell out, and we think this GPU will not available in a couple of months time. But while it is, it's worth comparing it while using newer technology to check whether, on this occasion, old is indeed better. See also Group test: what's the most beneficial graphics card?

The Shock of the New - The GTX 970 Takes On the 780 Ti

Possibly the first surprising time of these two cards is that they are both manufactured using the same 0. 28nm processor. Traditionally, a smaller manufacturing process have been used for every single new generation of chips.

That allows the GPUs to get smaller and easy to fit on your PC, Otherwise It's hard to set new generation cards to our PC thanks for the chips that use to control the size of the Graphic Cards,  and implies they generate much less heat, and it can be easily run at higher speeds for 4k games as well.

Alternatively, there's more room exists for be filled along with extra goodies. Even so, we'll have to wait a bit more time before nVidia can improve on 0.28nm, so the company has needed to look elsewhere to its new edge.

NVidia GTX 780 Ti vs NVidia GTX 970 and AMD Radeon R9 290X: Maxwell vs Kepler

So, just how does the GTX 970's Maxwell maker compare to that particular of the Kepler-equipped 780 Ti? Properly, the older Kepler GPUs came with a carefully intended system that revolved round the SMX "Streaming Multiprocessor new generation" unit.

Maxwell, even though, will be built up from SMMs "Streaming Multiprocessor Maxwell". These are actually considerably smaller, to ensure the newer architecture is a lot more efficient at  controlling facts. There's more command over individual area, and bottlenecks has to be reduced for better gaming.

There's also much less sharing between different factors of the structures, and the high-performance L1 and also L2 memory caches are also enhanced. The L2 cache, especially, has gone upward from 512KB for you to 2MB, respectively.

NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X: AMD Radeon R9 290X

How does the R9 290X enter this? Obviously, this product is likely to be still around in addition to competing with the NVidia GTX 780 Ti disappears from shelves.

Well, on paper, it comes in somewhere amongst the 970 along with the NVidia GTX 780 Ti. The standard 290X provides 2816 shader cores - only a smidge prior to the 780 Ti's 2880, and also a huge distance free from the 970's 1664 shader cores. The 290X boasts rather more texture units than the 970's, 176, contrary to the 104 of Maxwell GPU.

The 970 holds a lead with regard to core clock data transfer rates - 1178MHz as opposed to the 290X's 1GHz - but it is the 290X that wins from overall texture complete rates, touting a figure of 176GT/sec within the 970's 122. 5GT/sec.

NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X: High Performance Low Power

Maxwell's awesome charm is available in its low power usage consumption. This week, it is about reducing energy, and the 970 pumps out an astonishingly low amount of wattage given the capabilities.

The GPUs feature a TDP (Thermal Style Power) figure, that estimates the amount of power your system should handle when using one of them products.

The GTX 970's TDP regarding 145 watts compares very favourably using the 170 watts quoted for most older and significantly slower GTX 760. The 780 Ti hits a fairly steep 250 watts in contrast, while the R9 290X gets nearly 300 watts, respectively.

In reality, the difference isn't quite as large, although we did frequently go to a gap of fifth there�s 89 watts under load between the R9 290X as well as the 970. The latter was also rather below the 780 Ti, this time seeing a big difference of 74 t. This is outstanding given the technological innovation, and is evidence that Maxwell really does extract performance at a fraction of the power. See also Best graphics card regarding 2014.

NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X: Benchmark Tests Info-gram

Well, For the test of the GPU's bechmark. We've put versions of these cards up against another at default configurations or video settings, and across 4 different titles & three resolutions, So that you guys can easily know about the setting for your best games, Here you can check :

NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X: Benchmark Tests

For the most informative decision here comes down to price and availability. There's actually very little wrong with the 780 Ti.

Kepler is probably the older technology, but cards with all the 780 Ti are usually immensely powerful. During the time of the 970's launch in October, the 780 Ti has been still rather high priced.

But prices came down, and whenever you can get a minute card for between £300 and £340, the Ti is a still the superb card.

Gainward's GeForce GTX 970 SLI Graphic Cards with 4k Gaming

Last month Nvidia launched GeForce GTX 970 that got positioned as the ideal candidate for "multi GPU" 4K games rigs, offers 16% more performance than the Radeon R9 290 on high resolutions although costing 20% much less than AMD.

After this kind of strong launch, AMD got forced to lower prices on the GPUs. The Radeon R9 290 dropped from 399 bucks to 299 bucks "10% cheaper than the GTX 970", the R9 290X dropped from $549 to $399 and also the R9 285 is around for as cheap as $229.

People looking for the game at 4K now take over some pretty capable multi-GPU options for as low as $600. Considering not even the GTX 980 can easily handle 4K gaming now, in the most demanding designation, obviously that is a great news.

For a minor premium more than the GTX 980, the GTX 970 or R9 290 might be doubled up around $600 or $660, Or it should outperform the lone GTX 980, however we bet the GTX 970 will probably outdo the R9 290 throughout 4K gaming as well as in power consumption.

Test System Specifications

So basically, we tested ever single card with Fraps to be able to record its average frame rate in seconds over the set amount of time. We typically tests for 1 minute. Reporting the average fps is how things are actually doing properly, forever. It's a fantastic metric sense that it's not hard to record and simple to implement but it does not expose the main story.

To obtain a fuller picture you'll have to factor in the card's frame latency, which looks at how quickly just about every frame is delivering the performance. Regardless of the amount of frames to design card produces usually in 60 seconds, if it can not deliver them at roughly exactly the same speed, you will observe more short points with just one GPU over another, something we have now witnessed but didn't understand completely.

Test System Specs

•       Intel Core i7-4770K (3.50GHz)
•     x2 4GB Crucial DDR3-2400 (CAS 11-13-13-28)
•     Asrock Z97 Extreme6 (Intel Z97)
•     OCZ ZX Series (1250W)
•     Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit
•     Samsung SSD 850 Pro 512GB (SATA 6Gb/s)
•     AMD Catalyst 14.9
•     HIS Radeon R9 290 (4096MB) Crossfire
•     HIS Radeon R9 290X (4096MB)
•     HIS Radeon R9 290 (4096MB)
•     Nvidia GeForce 344.16
•     Nvidia GeForce 344.16
•     Gainward GeForce GTX 970 (4096MB) SLI
•     Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 (4096MB)
•     Gainward GeForce GTX 970 (4096MB)
•     Palit GeForce GTX 780 Ti (3072MB)
•     Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit
•     Nvidia GeForce 344.16

AMD reduced prices on Radeon R9 290X, 290 card

 AMD has reduced prices on its GPUs of Radeon R9 290 & R9 290X. The Radeon R9 290 has decreased from its previous 399 Bucks price to 299 bucks, which is $100 off. For now the R9 290X decreased from 549 bucks to $399, a drop about 150 bucks. The new prices appear for a price drop of about a quarter for these two graphics cards.

Of course not all United States retailers get implemented the cut as yet and in the United Kingdom I have just had a check out at my price charts "& a few of retailers* and observe no proportional cost drop in evidence. Newegg in the united states has several R9 290s as well as R9 290X cards listed for the new prices In-fact "more exotic variants" along with custom coolers and et.c haven't budged much yet. Amazon. com also cut prices on these cards.

AMD's price tag cuts follow shortly from the wake of Nvidia's brand new GeForce GTX 980 & GTX 970 GPUs. It has been recently received through users and reviewers. The new-generation Maxwell architectural masters in the Nvidia GPUs lowers power using, temperature and sound yet provides great gaming performance for the users who loves to play first person or third person shooting games.

 A Tech Report says that MD's special discounts could bite same like Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 and GTX 970 GPUs are widely out of sale, either that or you need to pay a premium to have one. So AMD should hope that the freshly cut prices will help make some more sales while Nvidia hopes buyers can have a little patience while GeForce GTX 980 and GTX 970 GPUs.

Nvidia launches much better graphics processors GTX 970 and GTX 980

The Nvidia, an extend graphics processor manufacturer, exhibit its most up-to-date high-end processing devices (GPUs) the GeForce GTX 970 and also 980 this week.

The processors give attention to high-end performance specially regarding PC gaming, in addition to guarantee higher power efficiency than old models, Nvidia authorities called a press conference meeting in Seoul.

These GPUs will likely gonna allow (Nvidia powered) machines to proceed video game environments with higher resolution and more cool lighting.

The actual GTX 970 & 980 models provide the company's Maxwell chips architecture,  It does  take engine of "next generation" with cool-gaming, resolves some of the most complex lighting problems along with graphics challenges throughout visual computing.

Nvidia's latest technology, Voxel Global Illumination "VXGI" allows gaming GPUs to deliver real-time dynamic global illumination for the very firs time in the gaming world.

By using this technology, a lot of PC games are gonna significantly improved, as the graphics are often more lifelike with the actual game's lighting interacting realistically exact environment. This gonna take gamers to the next level of lifelike gaming.

Nvidia co-founder and ceo Huang Jen-Hsun said : "Maxwell is already in development for years  it always inspire our gamers and manufactured by the best minds inside 3D graphics company.

Nvidia also mention the extraordinary performance, efficiency and engineering would authorize developers to try and obviously do their finest operate and awesome gamers worldwide.

Maxwell makes it possible for developers to conquer these obstacles, combining the effectiveness and programming capacity required to model direct and also indirect light resources.

NVIDIA Shield Tablet Vs Nexus 7 – Requirements, Release Date and Price Comparability

As you guys know, "NVIDIA" recently released its brand-new SHIELD tablet in two versions: the LTE and the Wi-Fi only. The company manufactured this tablet as a full on gaming tablet and they promise that this gaming experience is one over the top, which resembles PC experience. Today we chose to compare this tablet with Google’s unique tablet, the Nexus (7) 2013. Keep reading to know about what differences are involving these tablets and which one would be the best for you.

Display, Exterior and Size

NVIDIA SHIELD product is equipped wih a great IPS LCD screen that measures 8 inches which can render some sort of screen resolution involving 1920 x 1200 pixels. And for the design, NVIDIA gives its tablet a top grain polycarbonate exterior case that features a matte finish. As for the sides, we can see furrowed edges which provide the handset a very interesting look. This tablet is 9.2 mm thick also it weighs 390 grms.

As Google Nexus 7 comes with an IPS LCD display too, but this one measures only 7 inches screen. Even though it offers a smaller display-screen, the screen resolution still sits on 1920x1200 pixels – identical to the SHIELD tablet. Regarding design, we can identify that Google made guaranteed its tablet got a black remove of glass for the sides and a new rubberized exterior case. This device is as well thinner (thickness: 8. 65 mm) and lighter (weight: 299 grams) than "NVIDIA SHIELD."

Hardware, Software and Memory

As we know SHIELD tablet is a gaming tablet, So we ain't that surprised which the device comes with better an improved performing processor: Cortex A15r3 which is a quad core functioning at 2. 2 GHz paired way up with Tegra K1 chipset in KEpler 1 SMX GPU. The tab can supports 2 GB of RAM and it also comes with 2 options regarding interior storage capacity: 16 GB & 32 GB (if you guys want to use a microSD cards, you can develop your memory by nearly 128 GB With Good Support). Th

e OS NVDIA SHIELD runs on the latest Android 4.4.2 KitKat.

Processor that properties the Nexus 7 is a Krait: quad core working at 1. 5 GHz paired up using the Snapdragon S4 Pro chipset from Qualcomm. Regarding "RAM & ROM", we can see exactly the same specs here (meaning two GB of "RAM", 16 GB/32 GB of ROM) but no option for memory expansion. The operating system the Google Nexus 7 works on is Android 4.3 Jelly Bean, It being a Nexus device you are usually always the first to get the latest version of Android, currently 4.4.4 KitKat

Camera and Battery

About the primary camera, both devices showoff a 5 Megapixels camera with similar functions (they don’t carry flash). As the secondary camera, NVIDIA taken something interesting, giving the same kind of camera (5 MP) from the front of the tablet, while the Nexus 7 comes with a 1. 2 MP.

As far we concern the battery unit seen for the SHIELD device overpowers one seen on the particular Nexus 7 undoubtedly (SHIELD battery volume: 5197 mAh; Nexus 7 battery capacity: 3950 mAh).

Price

If you guys are thinking to get the NVIDIA SHIELD tablet. So, you will get the 16 GB variant at the cost of $299. If you’re more interested in Google Nexus 7, the 16 GB version of the tablet costs only $208.

New NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet Review Full Details

The Shield tablet is quite much the culmination regarding lessons learned through 2013. While the Tegra Note 7 was a significant tablet, it needed to take out the profit through computer hardware sales against competition that was actually wishing to promote their tablets without any kinda profit on hardware-market. Meanwhile the "Shield portable" was a fantastic portable gaming device, but it was way too specialized not be a gaming device. Without an founded gaming ecosystem, NVIDIA is being struggling against established companies and their competitors.

Because of these influences, today NVIDIA is now the first OEM to launch a significant gaming tablet with the Android facility. While gaming tablets are already done before, they have been few and far between. Now it has long been technically possible for taking a high finish tablet and allow it to be usable for video gaming, but for the most part these attempts are marred by either the necessity for root or on any application that requires different work on the part of the user to make proper and exact control profiles on every game. In supplement, the SoC within the tablet is frequently under-equipped for rigorous 3D gaming.

Now that is where the Shield tablet also comes with K1 a passionate controller and a lot of custom software where it is marvelously cover the ground. Once again as the Shield tablet is really a gaming device it also needs to be a superb tablet.

To that end, NVIDIA features tried to separate this tablet also with DirectStylus 2 along with dual front dealing with speakers/bass reflex places. We have included the full specifications of a table below to offer a general idea for you guys that what the tablet is actually like.

One more suitable part instead of the basic specs, the tablet itself has got a bit more suitable industrial manufacturing material design. While the significant speaker grilles are maintained on the Tegra Note 7, the dimpled look and feel is gone. As a substitute, the finish is incredibly much reminiscent with the Nexus 5. The feel isn’t quite rubbery the way soft touch finishes tend to be. Instead, it feels more like a high hemp matte polycarbonate.

In case it’s important for the tablet area of the device to obtain decent material in addition to industrial design, of course ergonomics and materials design are critical for the controller. While Shield portable got great ergonomics, It used be heavy because the complete device had to suit in the controller. Having Shield Tablet, that’s will no longer the case. The results is that your controller is considerably lighter. While it even now has some heft for it, I no longer want to rest my own hands against some sort of table after substantial playtime.

Certainly, there iss more on the controller than simply just the buttons and also controls. NVIDIA just made sure to do things right by utilizing WiFi Direct for communicating between your controller and the fabulous tablet. The frequency used is actually depends on what access stage the tablet is associated with, so it can switch between 2.4 GHz to 5 GHz also as necessary. NVIDIA claims that will using WiFi Direct rather then Bluetooth drops latency simply by half, and also allows for microphone input and also sound output by means of 3.5 mm jack over the controller.